English
Bogdanka Kuzeska’s press conferences increasingly resemble an attempt to exert political pressure on media outlets that do not simply parrot SDSM’s party statements. A day after a defeat—which they celebrate for reasons known only to themselves—and at a time when their entire membership is lashing out at them and demanding resignations, the “truckload party” (SDSM) is busy focusing on the media. They hold press conferences to supposedly “attack” Republika, leveling various labels against it… We have no need to do that ourselves; their own membership and former leadership have already done so. We will simply make use of the colorful terms employed by those dissatisfied with the leadership of this “truckload party.” Instead of reflecting on what is happening within their own ranks—and why they keep losing—the party’s spokesperson attempts to manufacture a scandal and cast doubt on the work of Republika. The old expression “losing like the Greeks” has taken on a new form: “losing like SDSM.”
Let us clarify something for Kuzeska: journalism does not operate according to the dictates of “Bihacka” [SDSM headquarters], nor are newsrooms obligated to wait for SDSM’s approval regarding what they may or may not publish. Although we are under no obligation to anyone—least of all to Kuzeska—to explain the source of our information, the reasons for its publication, or the timing (for the record, we published it after the polls had closed), we will let her in on a little secret. We received the information regarding the voting results of the sick and infirm in Brvenica from individuals close to the clownish leadership of the “truckload” SDSM. That is the source of our information.
If SDSM has doubts regarding the integrity of the electoral process, the relevant institutions are at their disposal. Let them file a formal complaint, submit their evidence, and request an investigation. However, accusations of criminal activity cannot be based solely on the fact that a political party dislikes the fact that certain information has reached the media.
It is particularly telling that the “truckload” SDSM—a party that has spent years championing transparency and professional journalism—is now attempting to discredit “Republika” simply because it published information that does not align with their political agenda. Yet, at the same time, they implicitly acknowledge that the information is accurate. It seems they miss the days when they could subject the media to the kind of “torture” they once inflicted.
Kuzeska speaks of “the same methods used by Gruevski,” an “organized criminal group,” and an alleged electoral heist. Naturally, the evidence to substantiate these serious allegations is nowhere to be found; there is no established link between the published figures and any alleged unlawful conduct. It is clear that they are not just lost when it comes to mathematics; therefore, we feel compelled to point out that political characterizations are not the same as evidence. Furthermore, “Republika”—much like any other media outlet—will not accept being placed in the dock simply for publishing information that causes unease within party headquarters.
“Republika” will continue to publish information of public interest, verify its sources, and raise questions that matter to the public. Responsibility regarding the electoral process is determined by the competent institutions, not by party spokespersons during press conferences.
Therefore, instead of sending political messages and leveling accusations, Kuzeska should answer one simple question: if SDSM possesses suspicions or information regarding potential irregularities, why is the focus placed on attacking the media outlet, rather than submitting concrete evidence to the relevant institutions?
“Republika” will not seek permission from SDSM to carry out its work. Nor will it remain silent whenever party officials—whether they be genuine politicians or mere clowns—take issue with information that has been published.